[mission statement for corresponding Drafting Team 3: Equitable relief must, by definition, be tailored to the circumstances. The WG12 Commentary on Equitable Relief in Trade Secret Litigation will focus on helping parties and courts identify and assess the wide range of equitable (i.e., non-monetary) remedies that may be available at various stages of trade secret litigation and the circumstances under which they may be most suitable. Among the remedies to be considered are mandatory and prohibitory relief; monitoring by third parties, certifications, and other affirmative acts to protect trade secrets; and pre- and post-trial restraints on the activities of those alleged to possess or to have used or improperly received trade secrets.]
[Panel 2] The Range of Equitable Remedies in Trade Secret Litigation
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California San Francisco, CA, USA |
Fisher & Phillips LLP Atlanta, GA, USA |
Trailblazer Miami, FL, USA |
Boston Scientific |
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP San Jose, CA, USA |
University of Virginia School of Law Gainesville, FL, USA |